Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | ZTE |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is slightly better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's score of 78.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an older, thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11 version.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a display with the same size and a higher pixel count in each display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a bit better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, they both have the same (4K) video quality, a 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and the same video frame rates.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit longer battery life than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.