Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with an 82 score against 76.6. Although the Apple iPhone XR is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's construction is just a little thinner and just a bit lighter. The iPhone XR has a better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone XR features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, a way worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a bit smaller display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a slightly better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a much better 48 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a way better battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 71 percent larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, else you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.