Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 has a general score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's overall score of 76.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Google Nexus 6 has older 5.1 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version. The Google Nexus 6 is a noticeably older and thicker phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but Google managed to build it just a little lighter anyway.
The Google Nexus 6 has a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has 4 less CPU cores (but faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Google Nexus 6 has a better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit higher display pixels density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a superior storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a way more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a way better battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 56% larger battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Nexus 6, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.