Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's general score of 76.6. Google Pixel's design is incredibly lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels per inch of display. The Google Pixel features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 2770mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a way more mega pixels camera, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photos and videos and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and video.
Google Pixel costs a little more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.