Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting an 81.9 score against 76.6. Although the Google Pixel 4 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 were only released 7 months apart, the Google Pixel 4 is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a way higher resolution camera and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 128 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Google Pixel 4 is more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.