Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 has a general score of 77.6, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 overall score. The HTC U11 body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, even though it was released many years before. HTC U11 has a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC U11 also has more RAM.
HTC U11 counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 takes much better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a back camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
HTC U11 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 both count with similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have an external memory card slot that holds up to 128 GB and the same internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a way better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, HTC U11 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.