Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting an 81.3 score against 76.6. Despite of the fact that LG V35 ThinQ is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's construction is noticeably lighter and thinner. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.