Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's score of 76.6. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should count with all the same operating system features. Although the LG V40 ThinQ is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's design is thinner and lighter.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots clearer videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.