Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 global score. The LG Velvet is a a little lighter and somewhat thinner device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, although they were only released 0 months apart. LG Velvet features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Velvet also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
LG Velvet has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bigger screen. LG Velvet captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same sensor size, a same resolution back camera and the same aperture, the LG Velvet also has a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The LG Velvet features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has superior battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 17% more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG Velvet is also the cheapest one, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.