Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has an overall score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 general score. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a bit better screen density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a back-facing camera with more MP, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much better video definition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.