Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a score of 80.9 against 76.6. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, so it counts with some nice extra features and performance improvements. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra body is newer, just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit worse pixels quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better 200 megapixels resolution back camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot larger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a battery lifetime that's very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's battery performance, although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.