Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a notably newer device, and it's also just a little thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, providing some nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much better video quality, a better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.