Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-20 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a 78.9 score against 76.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) construction is extremely lighter and notably thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels number in each inch in the screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has 9 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a much better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a more megapixels camera and a much higher video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because it has a 9% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.