Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's global score of 76.6. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction is extremely newer, a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 12% more battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a back camera with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution, a way larger camera aperture, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.