Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a global score of 87.1 against 76.6. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is notably newer, a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a bigger aperture, a lot higher (4K) video definition, a more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.