Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-20 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a little bit better than Moto Z Force, getting a score of 76.6 against 75.8. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 construction is notably newer than Moto Z Force's, but it's somewhat heavier and thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cores (but slower). Moto Z Force features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a better device, it is a bit more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.