Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has an overall score of 76.6, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's design is much newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater amount of pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Moto Z Force Droid Edition has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a superior battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 43% larger battery size. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.