Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a 79.2 score against 76.6. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a more recent 15 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a very superior processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with more megapixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little better battery duration than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.