Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a general score of 83.1 against 76.6. OPPO Find X2 Pro is a a bit heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but both of them have the same thickness. Both devices in this comparison have the same Android 10 operating system.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit larger screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has greater battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a 48 megapixels camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.