Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has a general score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's general score of 76.6. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, providing some additional features. Galaxy A25 5G's construction is a lot newer, a little bit lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 3 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Both of them have a display of the same size, the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution and the same display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a way tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera with more MP and a lot better video quality. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A25 5G features a battery duration that's very similar to the battery performance in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, although the Galaxy A25 5G has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.