Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-20 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having an 82.9 score against 76.6. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A34 has a more recent 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A34 design is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a little larger display, a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a little greater display density. The Galaxy A34 has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A34 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A34. Both of them have a F1.8 aperture, the same sensor size and a 48 mega pixels back camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 128 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 and the Galaxy A34 count with very similar battery durations, although the Galaxy A34 has a 0 percent lower battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.