Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a global score of 81.7 against 76.6. Even when the Galaxy A41 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 were released with only 0 months difference, the Galaxy A41 is thinner and much lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A41 has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features and improved performance.
The Galaxy A41 has a processor that is very similar to the processor in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although the Galaxy A41 has 1 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A41 features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite better number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A41 has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.