Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with an 86.6 score against 76.6. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Samsung Galaxy A50s's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, even when both of them were only released 7 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a just a bit higher pixel amount per inch in the screen. Galaxy A50s counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a same size sensor and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy A50s counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has better battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.