Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a 90.7 score against 76.6. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer device, and it's also a little lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Galaxy A52 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy A52 also has a little better pixel number in each inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has a 12% bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot higher video resolution, a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.