Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's score of 76.6. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it's also a bit lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, giving a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a just a little better pixels count per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 12 percent greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much higher video definition, a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.