Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version. Galaxy A52s is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A52s has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52s has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy A52s shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a lot more mega pixels camera in the back, a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.