Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting a general score of 92.9 against 76.6. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a bit thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, although both of them were released only 2 months apart. These phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit worse pixels count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 12% larger battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot more MP camera in the back, a much higher (4K) video definition and a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.