Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting an 85.2 score against 76.6. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy F41 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10. The Galaxy F41 is a a little bit lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but both of them have the same thickness.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy F41 has longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Galaxy F41 captures better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy F41 also has a much higher video resolution, a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.