Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 general score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy F62 body is newer, but a little thicker and just a little heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels number per display inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Galaxy F62 features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.