Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a 76.9 score against 76.6. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime is an a lot older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but it is thinner and lighter anyway.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy On7 Prime, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display.
Galaxy On7 Prime features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy On7 Prime also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a larger camera aperture for better photography in low-light environments, a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.