Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is somewhat thinner and way lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, although it was released only 15 months before. The Galaxy S10e features just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixel density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.