Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a general score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's general score of 76.6. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 body is just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, although it's just a little bit heavier and was released only 19 months before. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a little better display density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.