Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, getting a global score of 88.1 against 79. Even though Apple iPhone X is a lot older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, it's design is thinner and lighter. IPhone X features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels quantity per screen inch and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
Apple iPhone X features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Apple iPhone X counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots much better photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a much larger sensor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.