Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, getting an 80 score against 79. The Google Pixel 3 is an older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. They have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% larger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to others, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.