Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, getting an 81.9 score against 79. Although Google Pixel 4 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S were released with only 6 months difference, Google Pixel 4 is just a bit thinner and notably lighter. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.