Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, getting an 82.2 score against 79. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a thinner and incredibly lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a way higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a battery life that's very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S one, although the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has slower video frame rates, they both have a camera with a 48 megapixels resolution and the same video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.