Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, having a 79 score against 77. Even being the best in our current comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's body is older, somewhat thicker and heavier than Honor 50 Pro. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Honor 50 Pro features a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Honor 50 Pro also has a little higher resolution of 1236 x 2676px and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Honor 50 Pro has a better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Honor 50 Pro has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with longer battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.