Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra, having a general score of 79 against 77. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is extremely newer than the HTC U Ultra, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a greater number of cores.
HTC U Ultra has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.