Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-07 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is just a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, getting a score of 79 against 77. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is newer than LG G7 Fit, it is thicker and a lot heavier.
LG G7 Fit counts with a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a greater pixels number in each inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better processing unit than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.