Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge (2024)'s overall score of 78.5. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, it must be noted that it's also a incredibly older, a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a little bit higher pixel number per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and the Motorola Edge (2024) count with really similar battery performance, although the Motorola Edge (2024) has just 5000mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a camera with lesser mega-pixels, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way smaller sensor capturing much lower quality photos, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.