Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an overall score of 79, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's general score of 78.5. Despite being the best in this review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a incredibly older, heavier and thicker phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a little better pixel count per inch of display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a better memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures just a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a lot higher video definition, a back camera with a higher resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.