Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having an 80.9 score against 79. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, giving some nice extra features and performance improvements. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's design is way newer, just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of them have a screen of the same size, the same count of pixels per inch in the screen and the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a better memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a greater camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with a much higher 200 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a battery duration that is very similar to the battery performance in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.