Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting a overall score of 79 against 77. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a better phone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it must be noted that it's also a much older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a quite better number of pixels per screen inch.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo takes clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a higher resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a better memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a battery duration that's just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S one, although the Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a 0% lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.