Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's general score of 79. These phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, providing a lot of extra features. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a much newer cellphone, and it's also just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same count of pixels in each inch of screen and a screen of the same size. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.