Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo body is incredibly newer, lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11, so it provides the user a couple additional features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a bit greater pixels quantity per inch of display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot larger sensor and a more megapixels back-facing camera. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features superior battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.