Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11, counting with some extra features and performance optimizations. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a way newer phone, and it's also lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of them have a display with the same size, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a better pixels amount in each display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much bigger diafragm aperture, a back camera with more MP and a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.