Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, with an 87.1 score against 79. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, so it counts with some additional features. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is extremely newer, a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of them have the same display density, a same size screen and the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back camera with more mega-pixels, a larger aperture for better images and video in low-light environments, higher video frame rates and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.