Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-07 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, having a 79 score against 75.8. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S construction is much newer than Moto Z Force's, but it is somewhat thicker and much heavier.
The Moto Z Force features a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better display pixel density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger number of faster cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a superior camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels. The Moto Z Force features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a way better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.