Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an overall score of 79, which is a bit better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S design is incredibly newer, but extremely heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit faster CPU than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 4 more cpu cores.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.