Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a score of 79 against 77.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's construction is way newer, but way heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a way higher resolution back camera, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features much more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 84% more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.